Session Information
33 SES 17 A, The Value of Margaret Archers Critical Realism for Researching Intersecting Gender Injustices in Higher Education.
Symposium
Contribution
This paper uses Margaret Archer’s theory of social morphogenesis/morphostasis which explains the temporal interaction between and within structure, culture and agency that brings about the transformation or reproduction of society (Archer, 1995). This theory is utilized to explain the changing function of the social model of disability. The claim is that the social model, which began as an ‘oppositional device’ (Beckett and Campbell, 2015) for the emancipation of disabled people, has been repurposed in higher education as a policy tool for reinforcing a neoliberal system. The “British social model” of disability (Shakespeare 2014, p.1) was developed in the 1960’s and 1970’s by the disability rights movement (DRM). Disability activists from the DRM challenged the cultural emergent properties of the past which saw disability as a medicalised individual problem or “personal tragedy” (Oliver and Barnes, 2012, p.20), and reconceptualised disability as the social construction of an oppressive society. Originating as a causal relationship at the socio-cultural level (Archer, 1995), the social model framework eventually “took on a life of its own” (Oliver, 2013) becoming a component within the Cultural System (Archer, 1995) with causal powers that bolstered the disability rights movement, underpinned national and international disability rights legislation and was a force for change in the UK (Hunt, 2019). Over time, the social model became commonly recognised as having limitations (Shakespeare, 2004; Oliver, 2013) and a wider human rights model of disability was endorsed by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (2022). Despite its recognised limitations, higher education institutions in the UK currently allege that they are taking a social model approach, both in policy and in their aspirations (Office for Students (OfS), 2020; Williams et al., 2019). However, the research underpinning this paper suggests that the extent that policies based on the social model can be effective in universities is constrained by structural, agential and cultural factors inherent in a marketised higher education sector. This paper uses Margaret Archer’s (1995) theory to highlight and explain the mechanisms over time that led to the appropriation of the social model for neoliberal purposes. It also considers to what extent policies based on the social model, a component of the current cultural system, are interacting with agents to reproduce ongoing constraints on disabled staff and students that are empirically evidenced by wide-ranging, persistent and embedded barriers in higher education.
References
Archer, M., 1995. Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press. Beckett, A.E., Campbell, T., 2015. The social model of disability as an oppositional device. Disability and Society, 30(2), pp. 270-284. Hunt, J., 2019. No Limits. The Disabled People’s Movement - A radical history. Great Britain: TBR Imprint. Office for Students, 2020. Effective Practice Advice [Online]. s.l.:Office for Students. Available from: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/promoting-equal-opportunities/effective-practice/disabled-students/advice/ [Accessed 24 January 2024]. Oliver, M., Barnes, C., 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Oliver, M., 2013. The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disability and Society, 28(7), pp. 1024-1027. Shakespeare, T., 2004. The Social Model of Disability [Online]. s.l:Academia.edu. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/5144537/The_social_model_of_disability [Accessed 25 January 2024]. Shakespeare, T., 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd ed. Oxford: Routledge. United Nations, 2022. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability (CRPD)[Online]. New York: United Nations. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html [Accessed 25 January 2024]. Williams, M., Pollard, E., Takala, H., Houghton, A., 2019. Review of Support for Disabled Students in Higher Education in England. Report to the Office for Students by the Institute for Employment Studies and Researching Equity, Access and Participation. [Online]. Brighton: IES and REAP. Available from: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/a8152716-870b-47f2-8045-fc30e8e599e5/review-of-support-for-disabled-students-in-higher-education-in-england.pdf [Accessed 25 January 2024].
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.