Setting the Scene 

The teaching profession faces a profound global challenge with a projected shortage of 44 million schoolteachers by 2030 (UNESCO, 2024). This crisis intersects with systemic reforms shaped by New Public Management (NPM) and neoliberal agendas, which have redefined education through logics of efficiency, accountability, and marketisation (Ball, 2016; Biesta, 2017). These reforms privilege measurable outcomes and compliance, narrowing the meaning of teaching and compressing professional judgment. Audit cultures and performance metrics recast educators as technicians, where success is quantified rather than interpreted (Mockler, 2011).

European data reveal that teachers devote less than half their working time to core educational activity, while administrative intensification and precarious contracts undermine identity and agency (European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2021). Appraisal systems amplify stress through performance-driven evaluations, and digitalisation fragments roles, adding layers of bureaucratic complexity (Molina-Pérez & Moreno-Medina, 2025; OECD, 2025; Ideland, 2021). These trends threaten autonomy long valued in European professionalism (Priestley & Biesta, in press). Similar issues are occurring in other parts of the world such Australia where stress, burnout and increased workload are impacting teacher wellbeing (Nwoko, et.al, 2025).  In tandem current discourses essentialise and simplify teacher ‘quality,’ privileging visibility and governability over judgment, while efficiency narratives marginalise relational and ethical dimensions of education (Mockler, 2022). The cumulative effect of these trends has resulted in a reductive framing of teachers as functional units, eroding creativity, ethical responsibility, and cultural meaning. 

Based on the significant issues facing the teaching profession, this presentation contributes to the call for an urgent need to provide an alternative that recognizes the depth, complexity, and richness of those who teach. The discussion advances the idea of moving beyond narrow metrics toward a view of seeing teachers as artworks. To address these challenges and reimagine teacher professionalism, a novel conceptual framework is proposed, with the following objectives.

 Objectives

Building on this provocative metaphor, the objectives that frame this presentation are interpretive rather than prescriptive, namely to: (1) challenge dominant narratives that flatten teacher identity into technical compliance; (2) explore how the metaphor of art illuminates teachers as unique, culturally embedded creations, and (3) contribute to conceptual and policy conversations that honour complexity and singularity.  

Questions guiding the Inquiry

Anchored in the concept of, ‘teacher as artwork’, this inquiry posed the following ‘what if’ exploratory prompts to generate meanings rather than definitive answers:

• How might this perspective disrupt reductive discourses of teacher quality and accountability?
• What new interpretive possibilities arise when teachers are understood as singular, aesthetic, and ethical presences rather than standardised agents?
• In what ways can this metaphor provoke fresh conversations about autonomy, recognition, and value in contexts marked by reform fatigue and scarcity?

Conceptual / Theoretical Framework

The conceptual-theoretical framework that reimagines teachers as artworks is grounded in both art and educational theories. The framework draws on an interdisciplinary approach, synthesising views of art such as Goodman, (1968); Danto, (1964) and Sontag, (1978) with educational theories (Biesta, 2017; Greene, 1995; Eisner, 2002).  Art theory offers a generative lens through multiple facets: contested meanings, historical situatedness, capacity for interpretation, potential for transformation, and embodiment of cultural values. These aspects align with the complex, evolving nature of teaching. Educational theory complements this by emphasizing teaching's ethical, aesthetic, and transformative dimensions.

Stemming from this synthesis of both art and educational theories, the current framework proposes seven 'artistic' manifestations of teachers: object of interpretation, expressive medium, ethical imperative, unique creation, work in progress, cultural artefact, and aesthetic presence. This conceptualisation resists reductive classifications, emphasising teachers layered, unfinished identities. By situating teachers within reflective and aesthetic registers it reclaims space for judgment and ethical deliberation amid standardization pressures.

This work is a conceptual inquiry rather than an empirical study, aiming to reimagine teachers as 'works of art' by synthesizing ideas from both art and educational theory. The metaphor serves as a tool for bridging the gap between abstract concepts and lived realities (Ricouer, 1981), in this instance it opens space for thinking about professionalism beyond managerial scripts, foregrounding creativity, judgment, and ethical presence. The approach to developing the seven manifestations of teachers as artworks encompassed the following aspects. (1) Initial Exploration: Consideration of various functions and qualities of artworks, such as imitation, emotional transmission, intuitive expression, and historical reflexivity, examining how artworks manifest themselves in diverse contexts and cultures. (2) Conceptual Mapping: Building on the initial exploration, the seven manifestations of the teacher-as-artwork were identified and refined through an iterative process. This involved mapping potential manifestations, critically examining their distinctiveness and relevance to teaching, and refining definitions. The process ensured analytical distinction among categories while keeping the synthesis open and adaptable. These distinctions were iteratively checked through discussion groups, considering overlaps and boundary conditions (e.g., when 'expressive medium' shaded into 'object'), and adjusting definitions for clarity. (3) Comparative Analysis: A comparative reading juxtaposed the mapping with dominant discourses of teacher professionalism shaped through aspects such as efficiency, accountability, and marketisation. This analysis attended to how these logics narrowed autonomy, creativity, and ethical judgment, revealing tensions and potential areas for reconceptualization. (4) Illustrative Examples: To make the metaphor tangible for various audiences, illustrative examples from diverse artistic traditions were included, such as Kahlo's self-portraiture, Smart's urban minimalism, Davis's modal jazz, Kusama's immersive installations, Beuys's social sculpture, and Ono's performance art. These works were explored in depth, drawing parallels with teaching practice and examining how they embody the seven manifestations in the framework. These vignettes function as interpretive anchors rather than definitive evidence inviting further exploration and interpretation. The approach emphasizes that this work is conceptual and synthesizing rather than prescriptive, intended to be generative and invite dialogue. By offering a new lens to view teaching, this framework aims to stimulate fresh thinking about teacher professionalism, potentially informing policy, teacher education, and professional learning. Unlike traditional empirical studies, this conceptual inquiry complements existing research by reframing teacher professionalism through an artistic metaphor, potentially opening new avenues for addressing current challenges in education.

Positioning teachers as creative, relational, and ethically engaged works of art opens possibilities. It offers 'orientational knowledge' (Rothuizen & Togsverd, 2024), providing educators and others with new ways of understanding their practice. Rather than prescribing action, it encourages seeing differently, therein lying its practical significance. The manifestations identified offer three key contributions as: 1. A conceptual vocabulary that helps researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners interpret practice beyond compliance logics, making room for judgment, imagination, and relational meaning-making. This vocabulary can reframe supervision, mentoring, and appraisal around craft, encounter, and ethical discernment. 2. Guidance for designing professional learning and teacher education that incorporates the seven manifestations as structuring devices for coursework, practicum reflection, and collegial inquiry to consider practical ways to translate the metaphor into development. 3. Provocations for policy conversations that balance accountability with autonomy, acknowledging cross-system diversity and the need to rebuild trust in teacher judgment amid audit and compliance pressures. This includes language for policy briefs that recognizes artistry and encounter as legitimate components of professionalism. While the framework has potential to stimulate cross-national dialogue about professionalism beyond managerialism, nurturing autonomy and imaginative engagement, its conceptual nature and the need for contextual sensitivity in its application are acknowledged. This presentation will further explore these ideas of teacher as artwork, examining their potential to reframe teacher professionalism. By revisiting the guiding questions, opportunities will arise to continue the dialogue about how viewing teachers as artworks might disrupt reductive discourses, open new interpretive possibilities, and provoke fresh conversations about autonomy, recognition, and value in challenging contexts. This reimagining of teachers as complex, evolving artworks invites a collaborative exploration of ideas, aiming to enrich and expand understanding of teacher professionalism in contemporary educational landscapes, while valuing the depth, richness, and ethical dimensions of teaching often overlooked in current discourses.

Ball, S. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education 14(8): 1046–1059. doi:10.1177/1478210316664259 . Biesta, G. (2017). Education, measurement and the professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49(4), 315-330. Danto, A. (1964). The artworld. Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584. Eisner, E. W. (2002b). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2021). Teachers in Europe: Careers, development and well-being. Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Bobbs-Merrill. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass Ideland, M. (2021). Governing Teachers through Ed-Tech. Springer. Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and Teaching, 17(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059 Mockler,N. (2022). Constructing teacher identities: How the print media define and represent teachers and their work. Bloomsbury Academic Molina-Pérez, J., & Moreno-Medina, I. (2025). Augmented Bureaucracy in Spanish Schools. Foro de Educación, 23(1), 43–59. Nwoko, J. C., Anderson, E., Adegboye, O. A., Malau-Aduli, A. E. O., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2025). From passion to pressure: exploring the realities of the teaching profession. Frontiers in public health, 13, 1505330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1505330 OECD. (2025). TALIS 2024 results. OECD Publishing. Priestley, M. & Biesta, G., with S. Robinson (in press). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Revised edition. London: Bloomsbury Rothuizen, J. J., & Togsverd, L. (2024). Situated knowledge between purposes and facts, and its relation to pedagogical tact. Ethics and Education 19(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2024.2400872 Ricouer, P. (1981). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442682269 Sontag, S. (1978). Against interpretation: And other essays. Octagon Books. UNESCO. (2024). Global report on teachers: addressing teacher shortages and transforming the profession. UNESCO Publishing.