Anticipatory Reflection to Help Student Teachers to Come to Grips with Their Pedagogical Practice
Author(s):
Evija Latkovska (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2011
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES C 03, Parallel Session C 03

Paper Session

Time:
2011-09-12
13:30-15:00
Room:
J 30/109,G, 27
Chair:
Marit Honerød Hoveid

Contribution

 

Anticipatory reflection is a part of reflection a few professionals in teacher education and nursing see as the missing component in the model of reflection worked out by Schön (1991) who talks about reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action (Schön, 1991). They argue there is a third part of the partnership of reflection and action: ‘reflection-before-action’ (Reed and Procter, 1993 in Burton 2000; Greenwood, 1998), ‘anticipatory reflection’ (Van Manen, 1995 in Conway, 2001; Loughran, 2002; Freese 2006), or ‘prospective reflection’ (Conway, 2001; Urzua and Vasquez, 2008). The emphasis in their approach to reflection is not on retrospection, but rather on ability to imagine, visualise.

The author of the present paper is of the same opinion. To her mind, the essence of anticipatory reflection for student teachers is to prepare them to become reflective practitioners by first of all being reflective student teachers. It can be done if teacher educators not only expect student teachers be automatically ready to reflect on their pedagogical practice but instead help student teachers visualise and make opinions on what their real first teaching behaviour and professional future could look like by activating their anticipatory reflection even before hands-on experience. That in its turn would encourage students under supervision of their educators to think of a realistic situation of their pedagogical practice thus avoiding having a ‘shattered image’ – a case when, for example, unjustified high expectations before pedagogical practice do not match the real classroom experience (Cole and Knowles, 1993).

Therefore the research questions of the study are as follows:

1. What are specific issues in student teacher's pedagogical practice (in particular, leading lessons) student teachers think they are helped with in their teacher education studies if their anticipatory reflection is activated?

2. What causes student teachers’ ‘shattered image’ of being a teacher in their pedagogical practice – what is discrepancy between anticipated and actual things? What should be done to avoid that?

3. In what way does the fact that student teachers’ anticipatory reflection is activated impact their self-assessment habits?

In order to answer the research questions following research objectives are set:

1. To analyse scientific literature on the research related issues.

2. To organise a standardised open-ended interview with student teachers before their first pedagogical practice.

3. To gather student teachers’ self-assessment essays on their experience of their first pedagogical practice.

4. To organise an open interview with student teachers after their first pedagogical practice.

5. To analyse, compare, interpret the obtained data from student teachers’ interviews and self-assessment essays.

Method

The present study is a separate case study within the frames of a more detailed participatory action research. It is organised based on principles of action research provided by Koshy (2005), Cohen, Manion and Morrison (2007), Altrichter, Feldman, Posch and Somekh (2008) who refer to the ideas of K. Lewin (1946, 1948, 1952, 1993), as well as of S. Kemmis and McTaggart (1981, 1988, 1992, 2000) and other authors. The research sample of the particular case study is a non-probability convenience sample as it is appropriate for a case study and action research. These are 14 third year future teachers of English undergoing their first degree education. Data collection methods: interview (a standardised open-ended and also an open interview), narrative accounts (student teachers’ self-assessment essays). The obtained data are processed and analysed by using qualitative data processing software AQUAD Six.

Expected Outcomes

The first thing to be taken into consideration is the fact that student teachers are not professionals yet, they are just learning. Nevertheless, they do have their prior knowledge and it has to be incorporated in their teacher education process because it personalizes learning and makes it active. It can be done through activating students’ anticipatory reflection as it helps them, first of all, think of the importance of specific issues in their pedagogical practice that can help to succeed in leading lessons (for example, importance of involving, considering and engaging learners, preparing adequately, creating positive atmosphere) and what they can do about these matters. Secondly, if students experience future oriented reflection before their pedagogical practice, it is easier for them to engage in the process of reflection-on-action during their teaching practice as they have developed certain habits of self-assessment. Even though, as regards ‘shattered images’ – visualising being teachers in pedagogical practice and actual teaching experience, not always anticipatory reflection based activities can help student teachers avoid them completely. But there are also cases when actual teaching experience has turned out to be better than expected before.

References

Akbari, R. (2007) “Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education”, System 35, pp. 192–207. Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P. and Somekh, B. (2008) Teachers Investigate their Work. An Introduction to action research across the professions. London and New York: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group. Burton, A. J. (2000) ”Reflection: nursing’s practice and education panacea?”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31 (5), pp. 1009-1017. Cohen. L., Manion. L. and Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education. London and New York: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group. Cole, A. L. and Knowles, J. G. (1993) “Shattered images: Understanding expectations and realities of field experiences”, Teaching and Teacher Education Vol. 9, No. 5/6, pp. 457–471. Conway, P. F. (2001) ”Anticipatory refection while learning to teach: from a temporally truncated to a temporally distributed model of reflection in teacher education”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, pp. 89-116. Freese, A. R. (2006) “Reframing one’s teaching: Discovering our teacher selves through reflection and inquiry”, Teaching and Teacher Education 22, pp. 100–119. Greenwood, J. (1998) ”The role of reflection in single and double loop learning”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, pp. 1048-1053. Koshy, V. (2005) Action Research for Improving Practice. Great Britain: SAGE Publications. Loughran, J. J. (2002) “Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 53, No. 1, January/February, pp. 33-43. Parsons, M. and Stephenson, M. (2005) “Developing reflective practice in student teachers: collaboration and critical partnerships”, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 95–116. Schön, A. D. (1991) The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. England: Ashgate Publising Limited. Urzua, A. and Vasquez, C. (2008) ”Reflection and professional identity in teachers’ future-oriented discourse”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, pp. 1935-1946.

Author Information

Evija Latkovska (presenting / submitting)
University of Latvia
Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art
Rīga

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.