Teachers' Attitudes on Inclusion: An Analysis of the Specific Conditions under Which Inclusive Education Is Being Developed in Spain
Author(s):
Esther Chiner-Sanz (presenting / submitting) Maria Cristina Cardona Molto (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 02 A, Attitudes of Different Groups I

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
15:15-16:45
Room:
FFL - Aula 16
Chair:
Gottfried Biewer

Contribution

In the past three decades Spain has developed a very progressive legislative body regarding the inclusion of students with special educational needs (SEN) in regular settings (LISMI, 1985; LOGSE, 1990; LOE, 2006). At present, teachers have to confront the new demands of having all students in their classes, regardless of multiple and diverse educational needs. The presence of SEN students in regular classrooms implies new ways of understanding education and the instruction of these students. Therefore, it is important to know what teachers think about inclusion and the conditions under which it is being devoloped in Spain in order to take adequate and responsible decisions to promote more inclusive settings. In Spain, although the inclusion movement has contributed to reinforce general education teachers’ basic responsibility for increasing student participation, little is known about teachers’ complete acceptability of this practice and the reasons that may lay behind it.

Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion have been, indeed, one of the major concerns in educational research. Literature reflects that teachers agree with the general concept of inclusion (Authors, 2011; Avramidis & Norwich, 2002; Scruggs & Mastropieri, 1996). However, their attitudes are less positive when they have to include SEN students in their classrooms. This ambivalence seems to be related to some variables that may lessen their willingness to teaching these students in regular classes, such as the lack of training, time, resources and supports to address students’ needs. According to Avramidis, Bayliss and Burden (2000) teachers request more pre-service and in-service training to respond to their students’ needs, particularly, to attend to students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Moreover, Van Reusen, Shoho and Barker (2001) concluded that teachers with more negative attitudes towards inclusion were those who had little knowledge or training in special education. In other studies teachers demanded more time, resources and personal supports to adequately respond to diversity in their classes (Horne & Timmons, 2009; Scruggs & Mastropieri, 1996).  Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion have been sufficiently studied (Author, 2011; Avramidis & Norwich, 2002), but little is known about how specific conditions in terms of training, time to individualised teaching, and availability of resources and supports may affect these attitudes.  Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate teachers’ attitudes on inclusion considering the specific conditions under which this practice is being devoloped in the province of Alicante, Spain, by examining the following research questions:

1)      What attitudes do kindergarten, elementary, and secondary teachers in the province of Alicante hold towards inclusion?

2)      To what extent do training, time, and availability of resources and supports affect these teachers’ attitudes?

Method

Participants The sample consisted of 78 schools and 336 regular education teachers randomly selected from all public schools of the province of Alicante. A total of the 109 respondent teachers were male (33%) and 221 were female (67%). Their age ranged between 23 and 64. Sixty-eight of the participants (20.2%) were teaching kindergarten; 133 (39.6%) elementary education; and 135 (40.2%) secondary education. Half of the participants (n = 172) had over 15 years of teaching experience, and only 39 respondents (11.6%) had 3 or less years of teaching experience. Instrumentation The Teachers’ Perceptions towards Inclusion Questionnaire (Cardona, Gómez-Canet, & González-Sánchez, 2000) was used to examine teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and the conditions under which teachers work (training, time, material resources, and personal supports). Participants responded a total of 12 questions using a five-point Likert scale. The instrument showed an acceptable internal consistency and content validity. Procedures Questionnaries, along with two cover letters for the school principal and the participating teachers, were distributed personally to each of the 78 participating schools (response rate 72%). After the first deadline (two weeks) all responded surveys were collected and the return date was extended one more week. Confidentiality was guaranteed at all times.

Expected Outcomes

Overall, teachers agree with the principles of inclusion, but no with full inclusion. Teachers also reported a lack of training, time, resources, and supports to attend students’ SEN. Teachers’ attitudes did not vary significantly as a function of teacher training, time, and resources. Only the availability of support of the special education teacher seemed to affect teachers’ attitudes. Findings from this study are consistent with previous research (Alemany & Villuendas, 2004; Author, 2011; Authors, 2011; Avramidis & Norwich, 2002; Cook, Cameron & Tankersley, 2007) that shows that teachers support inclusion with reticences. Teachers find some barriers to its implementation (lack of training, resources and supports), a fact that may be hindering teacher willingness to put inclusion into practice. Significant differences in teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion depending on the availability of supports, suggests that the lack of resources and supports means an obstacle for teachers to promote inclusion and to develop positive attitudes. Government and educational administrations should provide teachers with all the supports and resources that are necessary to implement inclusion in a responsible and meaningful way.

References

Alemany, I. & Villuendas, M. D. (2004). Las actitudes del profesorado hacia el alumnado con necesidades educativas especiales. Convergencia.Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 11(34), 183-215. Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P. & Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 191-211. Avramidis, E. & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers' attitudes towards integration / inclusion: a review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129-147. Author (2011). Teachers’ opinion relative to inclusion in Spain: A comparison between experienced and inexperienced teachers. The International Jouranl of Diversity in Organisations, Communities, & Nations, 11(3), 151-168. Authors (2011). A study of teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and its relationship with some demographic variables in Spain. In IASE (Ed.), Educating every learner, every day: A global responsibility (pp. 119-123). Carbonadale, IL: IASE. Horne, P. E. & Timmons, V. (2009). Making it work: teachers' perspectives on inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 273-286. Idol, L. (2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education. A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 77-94. LISMI (1982). Ley 13/1982, de 7 de abril, de Integración Social de los Minusválidos. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 20/04/82. LOE (2006). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 04/05/06. LOGSE (1990). Ley 1/1990, de 3 de octubre, de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 04/10/90. Scruggs, T. E. & Mastropieri, M. A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 63(1), 59-74. Van Reusen, A. K., Shoho, A. R., & Barrer, K. S. (2001). High school teacher attitudes toward inclusión. The High School Journal, 84(2), 7-17.

Author Information

Esther Chiner-Sanz (presenting / submitting)
University of Alicante
Faculty of Education
Alicante
University of Alicante
Faculty of Education
Alicante

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.