Promoting Inclusive Practice for Pupils Experiencing Social and Emotional Behavioural Difficulties (SEBD)
Author(s):
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 06 B, Effective Provision: Improving Education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-19
15:30-17:00
Room:
FFL - Aula 17
Chair:
Philip Ferguson

Contribution

It is generally accepted that social and emotional behavioural difficulties (SEBD) present a significant barrier to effective participation within education for children across the world. This paper presents the initial findings of a research and development project conducted within two Scottish local authorities evaluating a social constructivist group work approach to supporting such children, building upon a previous study (Mowat, 2010). The study explored the proposition that, in order to effect changes in behaviour, children need to develop intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences (Gardner, 1999).

 

The current study was sponsored by the Esmee Fairbairn Foundation. The study operated across three projects: Primary 6 [age 9-10], the transition from Primary to Secondary school [age 11-12], and Secondary 2 [age 12-13]. Six Clusters of schools participated within the study. Each cluster consisted of a Secondary school and one, two or three of its Associated Primaries. The study population constituted 66 pupils, drawn from across the three projects, and matched to a further 66 comparator pupils who were considered not to be experiencing SEBD.

 

Pupils were nominated on the basis that they were experiencing difficulty in coping with the norms of school life and/or were considered to be at risk of developing SEBD. The intervention consisted of a weekly session of around 50 minutes for 16 weeks and there were three or four pupils within each group, led by a Support Group Leader. The Support Group Leaders received four days of training and were supported through Cluster Meetings, a website and regular Newsletters. The approach seeks to promote intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligence through the application of the Teaching for Understanding Framework (Perkins, 1993). Pupils participated within activities which were designed specifically to promote discussion and reflection and to teach for understanding and for transfer.

 

The principal focus of the study was to ascertain the efficacy of the approach and to identify variables which impacted positively or negatively upon pupil progress as a means of identifying factors which promote inclusive practice when working with children experiencing SEBD, in line with the principles of the Salamanca Statement (UNESCO, 1994) with its emphasis upon inclusion and participation as being essential to human dignity and human rights. The study also sought to explore issues pertaining to the management of change and leadership, pedagogy and the transition between Primary and Secondary schooling.

 

Research Questions

 

  1. To what extent, if any, have pupils developed further, intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences?
  2. To what extent, if any, has this impacted upon the pupils’ capacity to regulate their behaviour with good judgement in a range of contexts; capacity to form and maintain effective interpersonal relationships and for empathy; self-esteem and confidence and learning dispositions?
  3. What are the variables which have impacted upon pupil progress?
  4. What can be learned from the study to inform understanding of the management of change and leadership?
  5. What can be learned from the study to inform understanding of pedagogy; the transition from Primary to Secondary; and the inclusion of pupils experiencing SEBD in mainstream schools?

Method

A mixed-methods case study approach [principally qualitative] was adopted to carry out the study. Data were drawn from the pupils themselves, their parents/guardians, a sample of classroom teachers [a purposive sample] and the Support Group Leader who led the group. Statistical data were gathered on all pupils within the study on attendance, attainment and discipline measures [as identified by the Clusters themselves] at three points within the study. All pupils completed an attitudinal questionnaire, devised by the researcher, based upon a semantic differential scale, both pre- and post-intervention. Open questionnaires were issued to a sample of pupils [one or two pupils from each support group] and the aforementioned stakeholders, based upon a stratified, multi-phase sampling method, based upon criteria such as gender. A similar sampling method was used to identify one pupil from each Cluster and their related stakeholders, representative of 2 pupils for each project, to participate in scheduled interviews. Focus Group Discussions were held with the participating staff within each Cluster and all staff completed a Likert Scale questionnaire evaluating the approach against ‘Journey to Excellence’ (HMIE, 2006). Quantitative data were analysed via non-parametric testing (chi-squared tests) and qualitative data via thematic analysis (King and Horrocks, 2010).

Expected Outcomes

In general, the findings support those of the initial study. Strong evidence emerged of pupils developing intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences. This manifested itself in a variety of ways and impacted upon other outcomes, such as the capacity to regulate behaviour. To a surprising extent, outcomes manifested themselves within the home and parents noted changes in pupils, sustained beyond the intervention, such as more cooperative behaviour towards siblings. Relationships emerged as key. For the majority of pupils, the support group afforded a safe, supportive environment in which pupils were listened to and affirmed, enabling trusting and respectful relationships to develop between the Support Group leader and the pupils within the group and between the pupils themselves. Group dynamics emerged as an important variable in the success or otherwise of a group. Whilst there were initial concerns about pupils being ‘singled out’, these concerns dissipated once the child had participated within the group. Target-setting emerged as an important factor in the improvements evidenced by pupils but some pupils were uncomfortable with the process. The commitment of the senior management team within the school towards the intervention also emerged as a key factor in the success or otherwise of the approach.

References

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books. Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education. (2006). How good is our school? The Journey to Excellence. King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE. Mowat, J.G. (2010). The inclusion of pupils perceived as having SEBD: Affordances and Constraints. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 14(6), 631-648. Perkins, D. (1993). Teaching for Understanding. American Educator, 17(3), 28-35. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement.

Author Information

Joan Gaynor Mowat (presenting / submitting)
University of Strathclyde
Helensburgh
University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.