Teachers` Self-evaluation of Inclusive Education in Czech Primary Schools
Author(s):
Jana Kratochvílová (presenting / submitting) Jiří Havel
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 02 A, Attitudes of Different Groups I

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
15:15-16:45
Room:
FFL - Aula 16
Chair:
Gottfried Biewer

Contribution

This paper shows the complexity of the ongoing process of transformation of Czech schools focused on implementing the ideas of inclusion in the real life of schools and the differences between schools.

The results of the research presented in this paper area is part of the extended research project   „Special Needs of Pupils in the Context of the Framework Educational Programme for Basic Education“, implemented at the Masaryk University in Brno (2007-2013). In this project we asked whether the Czech educational system is ready to implement and support inclusive education in general, what conditions and requirements are defined by the State towards inclusive education, whether schools are ready to accept and provide support to all pupils, for whom the inclusive education is a benefit and whether we, as educators of teachers, are ready to and able to adapt the current study programs and the content of their disciplines into practice?

To be able to answer these questions we formulated the basic objectives resulting in the overall design of empirical research for the six-year period 2007-2013.  Progress of research, we divided into four stages, in terms of time and in terms of research goals.

In this paper we focused on the results from the second part of the research.

The aim of our research was to determine what conditions teachers create to their pupils in primary schools in education from the view of inclusion and how they evaluate these conditions themselves and verbalize. The starting point for our investigation has become the following research questions: How do teachers assess the level of security conditions of inclusive education in their school? Are teachers able to agree to the self-evaluation conditions at work in a team? How do teachers understand the offered indicators of inclusion? What arguments do teachers choose for defend of their evaluation? What arguments do teachers use for improving the situation?

Our objectives were to verify the Czech version of the questioner Framework for self-evaluation of conditions of education 2007 (modified version of the British original “Index for inclusion” and subsequently to create the new version, a simpler tool for monitoring the conditions of education supporting the inclusion in our environment and to validate it.

Based on experience with research tool Framework for self-evaluation of conditions of education we decided to reduce the 2007 questionnaire, which included mainly revision of criteria for assessing the conditions of inclusion - the overall "slimming", revision of guiding questions, reducing the number of indicators of inclusion, the insertion of some new statements that relate to some criteria for inclusion, increased clarity of criteria and indicators, some reformulation of the text etc.

The new version of the questioner we verified in 2011.

 

Method

The research applies mixed design (quantitative and qualitative approach). For our research we have taken over a modified Czech version of the questionnaire The Framework of self-evaluation conditions of education (from the British origin Index for inclusion). Based on research results, we tried to propose a much simpler form of the questionnaire, which would correspond to the Czech environment. For finding answers to the questions above we used quantitative and qualitative approach.

Expected Outcomes

From the qualitative analysis, we obtained information, which criteria of the inclusion are evaluated as the best, worst, and that criteria among which are the biggest differences. We found that the between schools are large differences in the evaluation of its terms of inclusion. For qualitative analysis, we obtained a set of arguments for sub-criteria, which justify their ratings and also an idea about how to improve the conditions for inclusion. The research described above was followed by structured observations in the participating schools. The method of observation and in particular we want to verify objectively the results directly in schools. We could see how the feedback they provided reflects their work in practice. The presented results show the complexity of the current process of transformation of Czech schools focused on implementing the ideas of inclusion in the real life of schools and the differences between schools.

References

Havel, Jiří – Kratochvílová, Jana. Autoevaluace inkluzivního prostředí v základní škole. In Vzdělávání žáků se speciálními vzdělávacími potřebami III. Education of Pupils with Special Educational Needs III. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2009. s. 127-135. ISBN 978-80-210-5032-7. Havel, Jiří – Kratochvílová, Jana. Vytváření inkluzivního prostředí na prvním stupni základní školy a důsledky směřující k profesní přípravě budoucích učitelů. In Príprava učiteľov v procese školských reforiem. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita, 2009, s. 693-699. ISBN 978-80-555-0014-0. Kratochvílová, Jana. Podmínky pro vzdělávání a strategie výuky při vzdělávání žáků se speciálními vzdělávacími potřebami. In Pedagogický výzkum jako podpora proměny současné školy. Sborník sdělení 16. konference ČAPV. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus, 2008, s. 553-562. ISBN 978-80-7041-287-9. Kratochvílová, Jana – Havel, Jiří – Filová, Hana. Sebehodnocení inkluzivního prostředí na 1. stupni základních škol. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2009. 99 s. ISBN 978-80-210-4948-2. Kratochvílová, Jana. Jaké podmínky deklarují školy svým žákům se zdravotním postižením ve školních vzdělávacích programech? In Komenský: odborný časopis pro učitele základní školy. Brno: PdF MU, 2009. 133, 5, s. 9-14. ISSN 0323-0449.

Author Information

Jana Kratochvílová (presenting / submitting)
Masaryk University, Faculty of Education
Primary Education
Brno
Masaryk University, Faculty of Education
Primary Education
Brno

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.