The Assesment of Child Protection System in Turkey Through A Historical Perspective
Author(s):
Pelin Taskin (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

ERG SES H 01, Inclusive Education

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
13:15-14:45
Room:
FCEE - Aula 2.1
Chair:

Contribution

The perspective on a “child” and “childhood” has changed considerably through the historical process. The child who was considered as a property of father in Ancient Greece, in this day and age, is accepted as a right holder individual. One of the rights that a child owns is the right of protection. The right of protection, having started to be formed through the effect of modernization in 19th cc, has come to a state that it is not limited to the protection just within the family, but also it covers institutional and judicial protection. (Akyüz, 2010, Archard and Macleod, 2002; Karadeniz Çelebican, 1989; Lansdown, 1994).

As for the Turkey, it is hard to say there is an effective and potent system for the protection of child. The reasons for this can be discussed within two main scopes: First is lack of legislation. In Turkey, the legislation aiming at the protection of child is inadequate. Second is intitutional deficiency. In Turkey, the institutional structure is insubstantial. Existing institutions have no adequate means and conditions. This paper will deal with and argue the reasons that are collected under two headings and that hinder an effective and potent protection system for child protection, through a historical and social perspective.

Accordingly, in the first place what is understood from the terms of “child in need of protection” and “child protection” will be explained in historical and social regard in Turkey and in comparison to the understanding of these in Western society. It makes this comparison required for that; while “Philantopist” associations and activities can be encountered in Western societies, the convention for child protection in Ottoman is too weak (Karatay, 2007). In the second place, Turkish Civil Code with related regulations for child protection in family, Turkish Penal Code with related special provisions for child protection, Child Protection Act, Circular on Institution and Its Responsibilities of General Directorate of Child Services, founded in 2011 within Law on Social Services and Ministry of Family and Social Policies, will be handled and and the child protection policies and applications that formed in the frame of those metioned above will be assessed.  In brief, in this part, to what extend these relevant legislations protect the child will be studied. Lastly, the working of institutions responsible for child protection and the approaches to child protection will be dealt.

 

Method

In this paper, the historical, politic and juridicial resources about child protection will be assessed by “document review” method. Document review is analyzing of written materials containing relevant information about the targeted research of events and cases (Yıldırım and Şimşek, 2000). By this method, it will be possible to handle the relevant legislation and policies about child protection in historical context.

Expected Outcomes

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the existing child protection system in Turkey and to reveal the shortcomings of it. Herewith, it is aimed at contributing to new legislations sheding light to law-makers and being guiding for policy makers and implementers in order to form a more effective and potent child protection policies.

References

Akyüz E. (2010), Çocuk Hukuku (Child Law), Ankara: PegemA. Archard D. ,Macleod C. M. (2002), The Moral Status of Children, Oxford University Press. Karadeniz Çelebican Ö. (1989). Roma Hukuku (Roman Law), Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları. Karatay A. (2007), “Cumhuriyet Dönemi Korunmaya Muhtaç Çocuklara İlişkin Politikanın Oluşumu” ( The Formation of Policies on Chidlren in need of protection in Republic Period), İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi (Unpublished Phd Thesis). Lansdown, G. (1994), “Children’s Rights”, in B. Mayall (ed.) Children’s Childhoods: Observed and Experienced, London: RoutledgeFalmer. Yıldırım H., Şimşek A. (2000), Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Qualitative Methods in Social Sciences), Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Author Information

Pelin Taskin (presenting / submitting)
Ankara University
Faculty of Educational Sciences
Ankara

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.