Challenges to Australian Education: Understanding Achievement in Government, Catholic and Independent Schools
Author(s):
Sue Thomson (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2012
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 02 A, Findings from International Comparative Achievement Studies: Frame-of-Reference and School Composition Effects

Parallel Paper Session

Time:
2012-09-18
15:15-16:45
Room:
FCT - Aula 11
Chair:
Michael Martin

Contribution

Governments and business leaders assert that in a knowledge economy, education is essential in ensuring a country’s competitiveness and advancement.  The OECD Growth Project (2001) argued the importance of human capital in the growth of knowledge economies, particularly in raising the quality of educational systems and raising levels of completion of basic and vocational education in order to maintain a flow of skilled people into the workforce.  Lack of education impacts on an individual's opportunity to participate in such knowledge economies, and may directly impact on their development. 

OECD countries participate in PISA to examine how well students are prepared to use knowledge and skills in particular areas to meet real-life challenges.  Strong performers on such tests are more likely to find a place in a knowledge society.

Australia’s school system is comprised of three sectors: government, Catholic and independent schools. This is the first time that the Australian data have been published disaggregated by school sector. On the face of it, the PISA data paint a gloomy picture for government schools and a bright one for non-government schools in Australia, and these data are no different from those of many other published achievement studies.  The gap in scores between students in government schools and those in independent schools in reading is 56 score points – almost 2 years of schooling. However the achievement gap between low socioeconomic students in government schools and high socioeconomic students in independent schools is 113 score points – almost 3 ½ years of schooling.

As results such as these are published, more middle and high income parents move their children into Catholic or independent schools, in the belief that they provide a better education.  The proportion of students in Australia enrolled in non-government schools has increased over the last few decades, and in 2009 Australia had a higher proportion of students attending non-Government schools than any other similar OECD country other than the Netherlands, however the nature of the private school systems in these two countries is completely different.  Recent research has pointed to this trend resulting in ethnic concentration and ‘white flight’ from schools in low socioeconomic areas, with public schools becoming increasingly viewed as being "ghettoes" by many Anglo-Australian families (Ho, 2011).

However OECD analysis (OECD, 2010) has shown that when schools are grouped into government and non-government, achievement differences are non-significant once student and school-level socioeconomic background is accounted for, and national analysis has shown that there are no significant differences between government, Catholic and independent schools, once socioeconomic background at both levels is controlled for (Thomson, De Bortoli, Nicholas, Hillman & Buckley, 2010).   

The social and economic costs of this gulf in achievement are large and will increase as students leave school.  The secondary analysis presented in this paper examines issues around the distribution of low, average and high socioeconomic students in each school sector, attitudes and beliefs of each group, differences in school factors between groups, and the influences of socioeconomic background at the school and student level within each subgroup.

Method

This study will draw from the international PISA data for 2009. These data provide a wealth of information not only about student level factors influencing achievement, but also about school-level influences such as school-level perception of climate and resourcing, and selection of students into schools. The primary focus of the analyses is the Australian data, but comparisons will be drawn with Canada and the United Kingdom, which have similar educational systems, and with the Netherlands, which has a similar proportion of students in non-Government schools. The distribution of socioeconomic background of students in each school sector will be described, as will differences in other student and school-level factors, such as quality of school educational resources, parental choice in selection of schools, school selection policies. Nine groups of students will be examined. Students will be divided into three groups based on their ESCS score – low, average and high. Hierarchical linear modelling will be used to investigate the strength of the relationship between socioeconomic background for each group at the student and school level, as well as other pertinent student and school level factors with reading and mathematics achievement.

Expected Outcomes

Some prior studies have found that the influence of student level and school level socioeconomic background varies for different groups of students, others that the effects are fairly constant across groups. This research will add to the understanding of these effects for different groups of students according to both their socioeconomic background and the type of school they attend. Initial analyses with the two most extreme groups and the overall Australian cohort found some interesting differences in school composition, such as low socioeconomic government schools enrolling 7 per cent Indigenous students compared to 0.3 per cent in high socioeconomic independent schools, and 3 percent for the entire Australian sample. It is hoped that this research will provide a more detailed picture of the influences on achievement in Australia and the other comparison countries, with a view to both adding to the body of knowledge and also laying to rest a number of oft-repeated misconceptions about the value of private schooling.

References

Ho, C. (2011). ‘My School’ and others: Segregation and white flight. Available http://www.australianreview.net/digest/2011/05/ho.html. Accessed 1.2.12 OECD Growth Project.(2001). Paris: OECD. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming social background. Paris: OECD. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman. K., Buckley, S. (2010). Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. Camberwell: ACER.

Author Information

Sue Thomson (presenting / submitting)
Australian Council for Educational Research
Educational Monitoring and Research
Camberwell

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.