Session Information
ERG SES F 12, Global issues
Parallel paper session
Contribution
The objective of this paper is to reflect on the participation process in participatory budgeting (PB) by analysing its educational value for those directly involved in the process. Although there is a lack of research concerning the European PB experiences, some researches have been made regarding South American experiences (Fedozzi, 1997; Pontual, 2000; Gret & Sintomer, 2002; Herbert, 2003) that have stressed the educational potential in this process. According to these authors, learning and personal impact on the many actors involved should be verified, e.g., what they have learned concerning the exercise of active citizenship, new ideas about the public space, new technical and political knowledge and new behaviour standards for the pursuit of democratic public management.
On the other hand, research stresses the relations between citizens active participation in society, higher involvement in political issues and the increase of confidence in political powers, but also the idea that the process of empowering citizens to political involvement implies the need to strengthen their self-confidence. Grounded on the concept of empowerment developed by some authors (Putnam, 2000; Menezes, 2007) and concerned with understanding how different practices are differently empowering, the question being addressed in this study is what impact the participation in the PB process has towards the empowerment and development of citizenship and political skills of those involved, paying particular attention to the dimensions of civic and political trust, self-efficacy, interest and satisfaction with democracy.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
CHAUMIER, J. (1974) Les techniques documentaires. PUF. 2ª edição. COLE, G. D. H. (1920). Social Theory. Methuen, London. FEDOZZI, Luciano (1997). Orçamento Participativo: reflexões sobre a experiência de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre: Observatório de políticas Urbanas e Gestão Municipal. FREIRE, Paulo (1975) Extensão ou comunicação? 10ª Edição. Rio de Janeiro. Paz e Terra. FREIRE, Paulo (1997) Política e educação. Coleção Questões da Nossa Época. Volume 23. São Paulo. Cortez Editora. GRET, M.; SINTOMER, Y. (2002). Porto Alegre: a esperança de uma outra democracia. Éditions La Découverte et Syros. Paris. HABERMAS, (1992). Citizenship and National Identity: some reflections on the future of Europe. Praxis International, pp. 1-19 HERBERT, Sérgio Pedro. Relação e confronto de pedagogias: Orçamento Participativo e Comunidade. 5º Fórum de Estudos Leituras de Paulo Freire. Santa Cruz do Sul – RS.UNISC. 23-24 de maio de 2003. MARSHALL, T. H. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. USA: Pluto Press. MENEZES, I. (1995). Educação Cívica em Portugal. Estudo Preliminar. Lisboa: Instituto de Inovação Educacional. MENEZES, I. (2007) Intervenção Comunitária: Uma Perspetiva Psicológica. Coleção Livpsic. Legis Editora. MOZZICAFREDDO, J. (2002). A Responsabilidade e a Cidadania na Administração Pública. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, nº40, pp. 9-22. PATEMAN, C. (1999). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press. PONTUAL, Pedro de Carvalho (2000) O Processo Educativo no Orçamento Participativo: aprendizados dos atores da Sociedade Civil e do Estado. Tese de Doutorado. PUC-SP. PUTNAM, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone. New York. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. SANTOS, BOAVENTURA DE SOUSA (1998): ‘Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy”, Politics and Society 26/4, pp.461–510.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.