Educational Transitions: Continuity or Discontinuity?
Author(s):
Gerdur G. Oskarsdottir (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2013
Format:
Paper

Session Information

23 SES 12 A, Transitions in Education, Evaluation and Practices of Support

Paper Session

Time:
2013-09-13
09:00-10:30
Room:
D-506
Chair:
Anne Larson

Contribution

The transitions from one school level to the next have been highlighted in the educational debate in recent years, in Iceland as well as in other counties (Broström and Wagner, 2003; Griebel and Berwanger, 2006; Einarsdottir and Wagner, 2006), addressing continuity and flexibility. A special journal, the International Journal of Transitions in Youth, and a Themed Monograph of the European Early Childhood Education Research Journal (No. 1, 2003), have been dedicated to this issue as well as the European Research Network on Transitions in Youth. However, limited information has been available on these issues, especially concerning teaching and learning or class-room practices across school levels. In this presentation recent results from a research project on educational transitions will be described.

The objective of the research was to contribute to the body of knowledge on the transition from preschool to compulsory schooling (age levels 5/6) and from compulsory school to upper secondary school (age levels 15/16).

The research was conducted within the theoretical framework of Dewey’s theory on continuity of experience in education, “the category of continuity or the experiential continuum” (Dewey, 1938/1963, pp. 33–50), which he repeatedly addresses in his work (e.g. Dewey, 1916/1966). According to Dewey, what the student “has learned in the way of knowledge and skill in one situation becomes an instrument of understanding and dealing effectively with the situations which follow” (p. 44). He claimed that “the principle of continuity of experience means that every experience both takes up something from those which have gone before and modifies in some way the quality of those which come after” (p. 35). Furthermore, it is the teachers´ task to give students assignments founded in their earlier experience and to create connections to the new one. Only then will new experience become educational. Although these ideas were presented almost a century ago, they are still alive in the scientific literature (see e.g. Elkjaer, 2000) and employed for analyzing teaching and learning (e.g. Carver and Enfield, 2006). Furthermore, this theoretical approach has been developed further by researchers (see e.g. Fishman and McCarthy, 1998).

The research questions emphasize continuity vs. discontinuity: firstly, in school structures, both external (including laws and national curricula) and internal; secondly, in the methods of teaching and learning, including school content, with an emphasis on student initiative and independence in learning; and thirdly, in the links and relationships between school levels.

Method

Multiple methods were used for data collection, including classroom observations in 30 schools in Iceland for a total of 46 school days, questionnaires to students and staff at the upper secondary level, and over 50 recorded interviews with students at four school levels (ages five, six, fifteen and sixteen) as well as their teachers. A frame was designed to evaluate the degree of continuity covering the spectrum from absolute continuity to total discontinuity, including a certain discontinuity which was revealed as a “backward break” or repetition in the curriculum. A special emphasis was put on classifying student initiative and creativity in learning activities from one school level to the next. Therefore, a three step classification from inactive receiving of knowledge or following directions over to self-direction and the possibility of creative work was applied.

Expected Outcomes

The findings indicate that school practices at the same school level were similar from one school to another. A strong continuity between levels was observed in many areas of structure as well as teaching and learning – even more than some other researchers have suggested (Broström & Wagner, 2003; Griebel & Berwanger, 2006; Einarsdottir & Wagner, 2006). However, a certain discontinuity was detected, including teacher expectations and the physical learning environment, and indeed a backward break observed in student initiative and school content from preschool to compulsory school as well as from compulsory school to upper secondary school. This backward break at two transitional joints in the students’ studies will be discussed especially, from various points of view. Those include the phenomenon of situated learning (Lave and Wenger, 1991; Dewey, 1938/1963, pp. 47–48) and the discussion on ready schools vs. school readiness (e.g. in Lam & Pollard, 2006; Pianta et al., 1999), addressing what schools do to adjust their curricula to entering students or individualize their approaches (Hargreaves, 2004). It is argued that the turning point for students when moving from one school level to the next seemed to be more an institutional phenomenon than a changed learning experience.

References

Broström, S. & Wagner, J. T. (Ed.) (2003). Early childhood education in five Nordic countries: Perspectives on the transition from preschool to school. Århus: Systime Academic. Carver, R. L. & Enfield, R. P. (2006). John Dewey’s philosophy of education is alive and well. Education and Culture, 22(1), 55–67. Cowan, P. A. (1991). Individual and family life transitions: A proposal for a new definition. In P. A. Cowan & M. Hetherington (Ed.), Family transitions (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Dewey, J. (1916/1966). Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press. Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books. Einarsdottir, J. & Wagner, J. T. (Ed.) (2006). Nordic childhoods and early education. Philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Elkjaer, B. (2000). The continuity of action and thinking in learning: Re-visiting John Dewey. Outlines: Critical Practice Studies, 2(1), 85–101. Fishman, S. M. & McCarthy, L. (1998). John Dewey and the challenge of classroom practice. New York: Teacher College Press. Griebel, W. & Berwanger, D. (2006). Transition from primary school to secondary school in Germany. International Journal of Transitions in Childhood, 2, 32–38. Hargreaves, D. (2004b). Personalising learning: Next steps in working laterally. London: Specialist Schools Trust. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Oskarsdóttir, G. G. (2000). Frá skóla til atvinnulífs. Rannsóknir á tengslum menntunar og starfs [The transition from school to work. Research results]. Reykjavík: The University of Iceland Press. Pianta, R. C., Cox, M. I. & Snow, K. L. (Ed.) (2007). School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks.

Author Information

Gerdur G. Oskarsdottir (presenting / submitting)
University of Iceland, Iceland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.